Skip to content

P957: show recorded service health in the open commander header - #1335

Merged
trissim merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
work/hud-repair-pi--P957--toad
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

trissim merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
work/hud-repair-pi--P957--toad

Conversation

@trissim

@trissim trissim commented Oct 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

P957 urgent companion: one header, not two policies

1 commit; 2 files, +20/-10 against current main. Paired with OpenHCSDev/agent-comms#3617. Original Core #3609 remains preserved/deferred; frozen ToAD #1321 is untouched.

Before → after

CommanderFrameView.present composed load and heartbeat age itself, dropping Core's recorded service failure. It now consumes hud.header, the same behavior used by Core HUD/load. The unused local time import and direct header composition are deleted (5 production lines removed).

Core owns recorded error/age/completion/stale status and the service-file observation dependency. This view paints that answer; it does not keep another health store or clock.

Root-only selector and acceptance

tests/textual/test_commander_page.py::test_commander_page_survives_unreadable_frames_and_recovers now includes a service-only failure/recovery while the frame file stays unchanged and the open disclosure/focus remain retained. Constructor uses named fields for the inherited Core load owner.

UNRUN: no author tests, checker, import probe, environment, GUI or provider execution. Root must qualify against the matched Core head and exercise actual installed failure/recovery with the board already open. The file-only presentation control is not proof of a successful native service pass.

Assumed: root records the qualified companion link and performs combined qualification/installation; no source or application acceptance claimed.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 29, 2026 21:40

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

@trissim
trissim enabled auto-merge October 29, 2026 22:18
@trissim
trissim merged commit 6dafc0e into main Oct 29, 2026
1 of 3 checks passed
trissim added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants