Repository navigation
Conversation
Chart CI passedRepository hygiene and Helm validation passed. View the workflow run. |
Initial CI — failed; runtime not executedAt head Repairs are being authored for the missing same-parent build-status fixture, comment-sensitive assertion, single-document Kubernetes List packaging, and dynamically generated unauthorized test tokens. No secret-scanner exemption, dispatch, production mutation, or runtime pass is claimed. PR stays draft. Network and overall qualification remain INCOMPLETE. |
|
Initial CI repairs are committed in The initial failed iteration still establishes no runtime proof. Draft status and network/overall INCOMPLETE boundaries remain unchanged pending current-head CI and integration follow-up. |
Second iteration: static and repository checks passed; runtime failed before buildAt
|
Pinned-client iteration: runtime readiness failureAll checks at The underlying cause is not established by that message. A narrow diagnostic change is under source review: bounded HTTP status, port-forward liveness, and sanitized pod status reason/count projections only. No gateway/kernel logs, environments, credentials, response bodies, pod specifications, or raw port-forward output will be retrieved. No auth/RBAC/resource workaround is being made without evidence. No core pass or executed network verdict is claimed; PR remains draft. |
Resume checkpoint and review closureThe qualification checks associated with head Bounded CI-integration follow-up now ADVANCE; the missing evidence packet and packaging-attribution questions are closed. Packaging ran on synthetic merge QA confirmed source-supported executed core coverage. Nonblocking gaps remain for deliberate runtime snapshot-query failure injection, missing chunks injected over the live websocket, and CLI/acquisition failure checks. Snapshot endpoint comparisons are not continuous monitoring. Documentation-only commit |
Observation race confirmed; deterministic gate authoredCurrent predecessor Commit Code, infrastructure-security, and bounded CI-integration reviews returned ADVANCE. QA-required selector/readiness/deadline cases are included in the new stdlib regression suite; QA advanced source coverage to CI. No local tests were executed. Automatic current-head checks are being monitored. Network isolation and overall qualification remain separate incomplete gates; no merge, publication, deployment, or production-readiness approval is implied. |
Synchronized observation: current-head CI passedAt PR head
The corrected ordering executed successfully: the live build-pod observation/invariant gate completed before the client continued. Earlier failing observations remain failed; this is current-iteration evidence, not a blanket stability or production-isolation claim. Workflow metadata associates this run with the stated feature head; its exact synthetic merge tree was not separately verified in this check. PR remains draft. Test images are not published, and PR chart packaging is not publication. No merge, GitOps selection, deployment, target-network acceptance, or provider-visible visual inspection is claimed. No manual workflow dispatch or rerun was used. |
Summary
First implementation stage of the owner-approved internal presentation MCP design: a disposable, PR-only Jupyter Enterprise Gateway qualification fixture. This does not implement or activate the production MCP adapter.
The 33 additions are confined to
.github/tests/presentation-qualification/and.github/workflows/presentation-qualification.yml. Synthetic one-slide PptxGenJS authoring is followed by bounded, digest-verified channel transport into a fresh rendering kernel, LibreOffice/Poppler conversion, and PNG decoding. Authentication, namespace-scoped RBAC, fixed pod configuration, and cancellation are exercised separately.Type of change
Validation
CI is the validation environment; no local test or runtime execution is claimed. First execution is this PR CI at commit
97213b8e70d0c0d0f3df72ac4664ebba5d23c341.Completed-code and infrastructure-security source re-reviews returned ADVANCE with no remaining Critical/High findings after repairs. The CI-integration review remains HOLD for incomplete supplied callee evidence (Medium); its snapshot false-green finding was repaired. QA identified unexecuted CLI/acquisition regression coverage and UID examples as gaps. These are not represented as executed checks. This PR remains draft pending CI and integration follow-up.
Network isolation and overall production qualification remain INCOMPLETE even if core CI passes: default KIND networking does not enforce the supplied static policy example, which is never applied. Snapshot checks observe endpoint metadata only, not transient between-snapshot activity. Mutable apt/npm/pip transitives and runner kubectl are documented fixture-only limitations.
Impact and rollout
Producer: these test-owned files in
makeitworkcloud/charts. Consumer: an isolated GitHub-hosted runner and its disposable KIND cluster. Test images are built and loaded locally, never published. No OpenCode chart files, versions, packaged skills, provider configuration, cluster Secrets/PVCs, image pins, or GitOps Applications change.The existing chart validation workflow is unchanged. Since this diff changes only
.github, changed-chart detection selects no chart: no OCI publication or automatic OpenCode GitOps-pin update is intended. Authored/committed is the current stage; CI validation is automatic on this PR. Production backend publication, selection, reconciliation, health, and actual provider image-review acceptance remain separate, confirmation-gated work.Rollback: reviewed revert of the fixture/workflow; no production rollout or database rollback. No merge, package publication, workflow dispatch, or deployment is authorized by opening this PR.
Safety and secrets
Synthetic runtime authentication only. No raw gateway/kernel logs, environments, kubeconfigs, or connection material are printed or uploaded. Snapshot persistence projects namespace/name/UID only. Explicit disposable kubeconfig/context, restrictive file creation, and exit cleanup are used.
Materially AI-authored. No runtime containment, deck-quality, Office-fidelity, licensing-complete helper packaging, provider-visible preview, production artifact export, or multi-tenant authorization qualification is claimed.