Repository navigation
Move exception verification into a dedicated JUnit5 extension #1654 - #1657
Merged
Merged
Conversation
vogella
reviewed
Oct 2, 2026
vogella
reviewed
Oct 2, 2026
vogella
reviewed
Oct 2, 2026
vogella
reviewed
Oct 2, 2026
vogella
reviewed
Oct 2, 2026
…-windowbuilder#1654 When cleaning up after a test case, it is checked whether any exception has been logged by the WindowBuilder logger. If so, the test fails, even if all checks were successful. Doing so risks resources being left, if the tear-down phase is interrupted prematurely. Instead, this validation should be done with a dedicated extension. Contributes to eclipse-windowbuilder#1654
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When cleaning up after a test case, it is checked whether any exception has been logged by the WindowBuilder logger. If so, the test fails, even if all checks were successful. Doing so risks resources being left, if the tear-down phase is interrupted prematurely. Instead, this validation should be done with a dedicated extension.
Contributes to
#1654