AZB #101279 Quality pack targets

[GabrielPinheiro7891]

Provide Bazel targets: unit tests, component tests, code coverage.
Added documentation

[github-actions]

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output

[License Check Output]
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: c69d6a90-664d-4bd5-8891-22d3652dcce5
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
WARNING: For repository 'platforms', the root module requires module version platforms@1.0.0, but got platforms@1.1.0 in the resolved dependency graph. Please update the version in your MODULE.bazel or set --check_direct_dependencies=off
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 3 packages loaded
Loading: 3 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 3 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 3 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 3 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (4 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (4 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (75 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (91 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (91 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (160 packages loaded, 3171 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (161 packages loaded, 7095 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (165 packages loaded, 9366 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (172 packages loaded, 9417 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (173 packages loaded, 9417 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (176 packages loaded, 11429 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (176 packages loaded, 11429 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (176 packages loaded, 11429 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (176 packages loaded, 11429 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (176 packages loaded, 11429 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (177 packages loaded, 11555 targets configured).
[12 / 16] [Prepa] JavaToolchainCompileClasses external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath_classes
INFO: From Generating Dash formatted dependency file ...:
INFO: Successfully converted 2 packages from Cargo.lock to bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/formatted.txt
[14 / 16] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox
[15 / 16] Building license.check.license_check.jar (); 0s disk-cache, multiplex-worker
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 30.996s, Critical Path: 2.12s
INFO: 16 processes: 12 internal, 3 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 16 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

[github-actions]

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

[ryan-steel]

This doesn't match up with the score process module_template.

I've started the component requirements work for the other components following the guidelines, see #151 and #149. I think we should have this structure across all the components. The actual build of the docs themselves won't work until the update to docs-as-code 6.0 is merged in #148 (updating to use docs_bundles so that we can have docs alongside source).

Please update to match the template.

[GabrielPinheiro7891]

I pushed the commit Update to match module_template , to match the template. However, like you said, until docs-as-code 6.0 isn't merged this will not work as we get:

"broken_references": [
{
"testcase": "testcase__SystemClockTest__NowReturnsTimepointSuitableForDurationArithmetic_nckqh",
"missing_need": "comp_req__system_time__snapshot"
},
{
"testcase": "testcase__SteadyClockTest__NowReturnsTimepointSuitableForDurationArithmetic_dhwjw",
"missing_need": "comp_req__steady_time__snapshot"
},
{
"testcase": "testcase__HighResSteadyClockTest__NowReturnsTimepointSuitableForDurationArithmetic_ogazc",
"missing_need": "comp_req__high_res_steady_time__snapshot"
},
{
"testcase": "testcase__VehicleClockTest__NowReturnsSynchronizedStatusAndTimepoint_xggob",
"missing_need": "comp_req__vehicle_time__snapshot"
},
{
"testcase": "testcase__VehicleClockTest__InitForwardsToBackend_vsaqs",
"missing_need": "comp_req__vehicle_time__lifecycle"
}
]

[GabrielPinheiro7891]

Done

[ryan-steel]

Feature requirements should be in eclipse-score/score repo, not the module repo itself - should these be component requirements?

[GabrielPinheiro7891]

Your right. Removed feature requirements as they belong to eclipse-score/score repo.

[GabrielPinheiro7891]

Created them as component requirements

[ryan-steel]

We should avoid having implementation details e.g. method names etc like this in the requirements. Review the requirements you've added here against the requirements checklists

[GabrielPinheiro7891]

Removed feature requirements as they belong to eclipse-score/score repo