Skip to content

Run control-operator tests in CI - #824

Merged
knopers8 merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
knopers8-patch-2
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

Run control-operator tests in CI#824
knopers8 merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
knopers8-patch-2

Conversation

@knopers8

@knopers8 knopers8 commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Just checking if it works.

@knopers8
knopers8 requested a review from justonedev1 as a code owner July 3, 2026 12:12
justonedev1
justonedev1 previously approved these changes Jul 3, 2026
@justonedev1
justonedev1 self-requested a review July 3, 2026 13:21
Comment thread .github/workflows/control.yml Outdated
- run: (make vendor)
- run: (make)
- run: (make test)
- run: (cd control-operator && make test)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe add just as well simple make as well to check if we can build everything?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's try. now it can't find protoc anyway.

@justonedev1

justonedev1 commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I split github workflows for control and control-operator as those should be thought about as independent binaries (except that core depends on the package from control-operator). However I think that there should some common setups, like the same golang version in all workflows etc... but this demonstrates working workflow for control-operator

@knopers8

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

thanks, let's start with that. indeed we should merge the two builds though.

@knopers8
knopers8 merged commit 3a6c14c into master Aug 10, 2026
4 of 5 checks passed
@knopers8
knopers8 deleted the knopers8-patch-2 branch August 10, 2026 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants